“Anonymized” data really isn’t—and here’s why not | Ars Technica

“Anonymized” data really isn’t—and here’s why not; Nate Anderson; In Ars Technica; 2009-09-08 (eight years ago).

Referenced

  • Latanya Sweeney? [maybe]; Some Paper; In LIDAP, WP4; WHEN?
    tl;dr → persons are uniquely identified using only three bits of information, most of the time.
  • Paul Ohm; Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization; 2009-08-13; ssrn:1450006.

Previously

In archaeological order, in Ars Technica

Comments are closed.